Home
Products
Support
Company
Clients
Locale
English (US $)
English (CAD $)
English (GBP £)
English (EUR €)
English (BRL R$)
Español (EUR €)
Español (MXN $)
Forums
shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Forums
Centova Cast v3
Bugs and issues
shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Register
Login
Username:
Password:
Duration:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Forgot password?
Topic
Print
1
(current)
2
shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Read 20271 times
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 05, 2013, 10:46:15 am
shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Hey guys.
I was having a discussion with DrO (one of the shoutcast developers) the other day and he explained to me that the most stable version of shotucast DNAS is the 2.2 NOT the 2.0
Does anyone use 2.2 with centovacast? Is centovacast compatible with 2.2?
I would like to use 2.2 since its the most stable and ESPECIALLY since we use B.U.T.T to broadcast. 2.0 has issues with B.U.T.T but it along with many many other features such as auto authhash ++++ more were fixed in 2.2
Headshaker
Full Member
Posts: 224
Logged
November 05, 2013, 11:11:02 am, #1
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
I'm just wondering where you can find DNAS 2.2 ?
Becasue it's not available through official download...
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 05, 2013, 11:13:13 am, #2
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
visit the shoutcast forums.
DrO who is the main developer is the main mod.
Its available in his official sticky thread here....
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=373139
Headshaker
Full Member
Posts: 224
Logged
November 05, 2013, 01:32:42 pm, #3
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Thanks for link.
I'm during testing
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 05, 2013, 02:15:28 pm, #4
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Sure thing.
Centova has yet to get back to me about this.
Dr Bunsen
Full Member
Posts: 162
Logged
November 05, 2013, 02:40:22 pm, #5
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
""This build is our (much delayed) update and introduces new features as listed in the “Changes” section below, as well as addresses bugs reported in the previous build. It is recommended where possible to update to this build over any previous v2.0 builds due to the stability and other compatibility improvements it provides."
"Much delayed" - No kidding!
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=373139
SHOUTcast DNAS 2.2 (Build 107) 10/16/2013 *** Forum Exclusive ***
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=332841&page=3
SHOUTcast DNAS 2 (Build 29) 07/31/2011
Last Edit: November 05, 2013, 02:42:36 pm by Dr Bunsen
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 05, 2013, 03:26:43 pm, #6
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
hah yea tell me about it.
Headshaker please let us know if you experience any bugs. I really need to use 2.2 since all my DJs use BUTT to broadcast and 2.0 does not support BUTT (has some errors which they fixed in 2.2)
heisenberg
Jr. Member
Posts: 83
Logged
November 05, 2013, 11:41:18 pm, #7
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Thanks for this. I'll install it on one of my servers today and let you know how it goes
http://www.radioboss.fm
- stream hosting
http://www.djsoft.net
- radio automation software
Headshaker
Full Member
Posts: 224
Logged
November 06, 2013, 12:55:18 am, #8
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
As for now everything seems to be fine.
No crashes, buffers, high cpu usage, etc.
Server control fully works.
Tested under MP3 for now.
But until Centova Cast won't update config builders we won't be able to use full features of v2.2
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 06, 2013, 07:01:08 am, #9
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Headshaker
"But until Centova Cast won't update config builders we won't be able to use full features of v2.2
"
Which features would this be?
My main issue with 2.0 is that B.U.T.T doesnt work with it and thats the software all my djs use to connect to the server. In 2.2 that bug was fixed. So when you say features do you mean NEW features or does that also include bug fixes?
cheers
heisenberg
Jr. Member
Posts: 83
Logged
November 06, 2013, 07:19:03 am, #10
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Seems working fine for me.
http://www.radioboss.fm
- stream hosting
http://www.djsoft.net
- radio automation software
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 06, 2013, 07:35:00 am, #11
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Do you use B.U.T.T to broadcast live?
miedzius
Newbie
Posts: 34
Logged
November 06, 2013, 02:16:05 pm, #12
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
New version of SHOUTcast V2 it's fantastic. Work perfect, no problems with AuthHash. Only Centova Cast not support this version, few errors in generation of config file. Some functions/options not exist in this version.
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 06, 2013, 03:24:58 pm, #13
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
so are you guys saying its safe to use (so far?)
GroovinMind
Full Member
Posts: 127
Logged
November 08, 2013, 07:18:02 pm, #14
Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
When updating shoutcast DNAS will my stream be down or is it un-noticable transition?
1
(current)
2