Centova Technologies Forum

Centova Cast v3 => Bugs and issues => Topic started by: GroovinMind on November 05, 2013, 10:46:15 am

Title: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 05, 2013, 10:46:15 am
Hey guys.

I was having a discussion with DrO (one of the shoutcast developers) the other day and he explained to me that the most stable version of shotucast DNAS is the 2.2 NOT the 2.0

Does anyone use 2.2 with centovacast?  Is centovacast compatible with 2.2?

I would like to use 2.2 since its the most stable and ESPECIALLY since we use B.U.T.T to broadcast.  2.0 has issues with B.U.T.T but it along with many many other features such as auto authhash ++++ more were fixed in 2.2
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 05, 2013, 11:11:02 am
I'm just wondering where you can find DNAS 2.2 ?

Becasue it's not available through official download...
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 05, 2013, 11:13:13 am
visit the shoutcast forums.

DrO who is the main developer is the main mod.

Its available in his official sticky thread here....

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=373139
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 05, 2013, 01:32:42 pm
Thanks for link.

I'm during testing :D
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 05, 2013, 02:15:28 pm
Sure thing.

Centova has yet to get back to me about this.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Dr Bunsen on November 05, 2013, 02:40:22 pm
""This build is our (much delayed) update and introduces new features as listed in the “Changes” section below, as well as addresses bugs reported in the previous build. It is recommended where possible to update to this build over any previous v2.0 builds due to the stability and other compatibility improvements it provides."

"Much delayed" - No kidding! :)

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=373139

SHOUTcast DNAS 2.2 (Build 107) 10/16/2013 *** Forum Exclusive ***

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=332841&page=3

SHOUTcast DNAS 2 (Build 29) 07/31/2011
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 05, 2013, 03:26:43 pm
hah yea tell me about it.

Headshaker please let us know if you experience any bugs. I really need to use 2.2 since all my DJs use BUTT to broadcast and 2.0 does not support BUTT  (has some errors which they fixed in 2.2)
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: heisenberg on November 05, 2013, 11:41:18 pm
Thanks for this. I'll install it on one of my servers today and let you know how it goes :)
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 06, 2013, 12:55:18 am
As for now everything seems to be fine.

No crashes, buffers, high cpu usage, etc.
Server control fully works.
Tested under MP3 for now.

But until Centova Cast won't update config builders we won't be able to use full features of v2.2 :(
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 06, 2013, 07:01:08 am
Headshaker

"But until Centova Cast won't update config builders we won't be able to use full features of v2.2 :("

Which features would this be?

My main issue with 2.0 is that B.U.T.T doesnt work with it and thats the software all my djs use to connect to the server.  In 2.2 that bug was fixed.  So when you say features do you mean NEW features or does that also include bug fixes?

cheers
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: heisenberg on November 06, 2013, 07:19:03 am
Seems working fine for me.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 06, 2013, 07:35:00 am
Do you use B.U.T.T to broadcast live?
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: miedzius on November 06, 2013, 02:16:05 pm
New version of SHOUTcast V2 it's fantastic. Work perfect, no problems with AuthHash. Only Centova Cast not support this version, few errors in generation of config file. Some functions/options not exist in this version.

Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 06, 2013, 03:24:58 pm
so are you guys saying its safe to use (so far?)
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 08, 2013, 07:18:02 pm
When updating shoutcast DNAS will my stream be down or is it un-noticable transition?
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 11, 2013, 04:05:49 am
You will be have to restart server.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: miedzius on November 11, 2013, 05:34:36 am
Centova Cast not support 2.2 yet.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 11, 2013, 08:54:05 am
THanks Headshaker.

Have you experienced any issues yet?
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 12, 2013, 03:22:27 am
Till now everything is fine.
No issues at all.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 12, 2013, 08:19:23 am
great.

Thanks!.. I sent you a PM.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 20, 2013, 11:37:22 am
Since I upgraded to 2.2 I have been getting some 480 errors (cant connect to directory)  This will be fixed in 2.2.1 but its not avail yet.

So if anyone is having this issue the temp fix is to temporarily set useicy=0 in the config file.


Cheers.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 20, 2013, 01:13:36 pm
I should also mention that if you DONT set useicy=0 in 2.2 your titles will NOT show up on itunes player and some other players.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 22, 2013, 06:09:05 am
I found this in log file:

 2013-11-22 13:35:03   WARN   [CONFIG] Invalid item on line 22 of ../rtpdc/etc/server.conf -> `yp1debug'
2013-11-22 13:35:03   WARN   [CONFIG] Deprecated statement found on line 88 of ../rtpdc/etc/server.conf -> change autodumpsourcetime_1=30 to autodumptime_1=30
2013-11-22 13:35:03   WARN   [CONFIG] Invalid item on line 102 of ../rtpdc/etc/server.conf -> `yp2'
2013-11-22 13:35:03   WARN   [CONFIG] Invalid item on line 164 of ../rtpdc/etc/server.conf -> `specialfiletmpdir'
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: GroovinMind on November 22, 2013, 08:08:19 am
If I were you I would go to shoutcast forums and post it in the thread so DrO knows.
Title: Re: shoutcast 2.0 vs 2.2 [2.2 is most stable]
Post by: Headshaker on November 26, 2013, 03:00:02 am
That are just warnings which DrO probably knows about. It is just going about the way how config file is generated by CentovaCast.